Over the past several months, Cutter Consortium Senior Consultant Paul Harmon has been studying the Extensible Markup Language (XML) as it facilitates business process improvement -- a growing trend. This month's Cutter Benchmark Review presents Harmon's research and analysis to help you determine how best to take advantage of the developing technologies that are enabling the integration of business processes.
February 2002
January 2002
In this issue:- January 2002 Cutter IT Journal -- The Great Methodologies Debate: Part 2
- The Great Methodologies Debate: Part 2: Opening Statement
- Agile Software Development Joins the "Would-Be" Crowd
- The Bogus War
- A Resounding "Yes" to Agile Processes -- But Also to More
- Agile or Rigorous OO Methodologies: Getting the Best of Both Worlds
- Big and Agile?
January 2002
Cutter Consortium's tag line is "Leveraging IT for Competitive Advantage." Integral to leveraging IT is managing the many relationships IT departments and IT professionals develop in the course of their work. Today's IT professional must be a people-person.December 2001
Resolved
Traditional methodologists are a bunch of process-dependent stick-in-the-muds who'd rather produce flawless documentation than a working system that meets business needs.
RebuttalIn this issue:- December 2001 Cutter IT Journal -- The Great Methodologies Debate: Part 1
- The Great Methodologies Debate: Part 1: Opening Statement
- Agile Can Scale: Inventing and Reinventing SCRUM in Five Companies
- Agile Versus Traditional: Make Love, Not War!
- Business Intelligence Methodologies: Agile with Rigor?
- Agility with the RUP
- Extreme Requirements Engineering
- Exclusion, Assumptions, and Misinterpretation: Foes of Collaboration
December 2001
As highlighted in this month's issue of Cutter Benchmark Review, the terms "success" and "failure" are not black and white. Unfortunately, IT efforts are often forced into one category or the other without regard as to why they're successful or have failed -- and whether "failure" may have in fact been the best possible outcome. The articles that follow provide some criteria you may want to add to your own when labeling your projects as successful or failed.In this issue:
Copyright © 2024 Arthur D. Little | All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service