---

Open Calls for Papers: Accepting abstracts for consideration.

► Innovating for Competitive & Successful Clinical Trials

► Digital Innovation & Climate Change

► Scaffolding Purpose

► Cultivating Resilience: Climate Change & Sustainable Agriculture

► Maximizing Business Value with Analytics

---

Innovating for Competitive & Successful Clinical Trials

Guest Editors: Ulrica Sehlstedt, Ben Enejo, Franziska Thomas
Abstract Deadline: July 26
Article Deadline: Full articles due September 15 (upon acceptance of abstract)

As the number of competing clinical trials increases each year, often targeting the same disease areas and patient pools, the successful completion of these trials and subsequent regulatory submissions is becoming increasingly challenging. Furthermore, with the rapid pace of technological breakthroughs and evolving therapy types, the stakes are higher for many sponsors. Finishing second-in-class often results in a meager return on investment. However, many drug developers are implementing significant cost-cutting measures. Balancing the need to stay innovative and competitive for the future while addressing operational efficiencies for today presents a major dilemma for the industry.

An upcoming issue of Amplify, with Guest Editors Ulrica Sehlstedt, Ben Enejo, and Franziska Thomas will explore innovative strategies and approaches to ensure clinical trial competitiveness and success.

Articles can address, but are not limited to, topics such as:

• What is the future of clinical trials and what criteria is required to “win”?
• How can drug developers cultivate capabilities today to avoid going extinct tomorrow?
• Given the lack of mastery, does the rapid expanse of technological advances offer “real” innovation and competitiveness?
• What measures can be taken by drug developers to reduce unnecessary complexity in clinical trials?
• What innovative approaches can drive true patient centricity in clinical trials and treatments of the future?
• How can the experience of patients, investigators and trial centers be improved to ensure more effective recruitment and treatment of patients?
• What are the risks of leveraging AI to accelerate trial cycles and patient outcomes?
• How should data privacy frameworks be adapted to fit future clinical trial needs while protecting patient confidentiality?
• What innovative strategies can accelerate the registration pathway for new therapies?

FOR CONSIDERATION: Please send an abstract (~300 words or less of proposed article scope and author(s) bio) to Ulrica Sehlstedt, Ben Enejo, Franziska Thomas and Christine Generali. Abstract submissions will be evaluated upon receipt, and authors will be notified soon after of acceptance status. Final article length is 2,000-3,500 words plus graphics. More editorial guidelines.

---

Digital Innovation & Climate Change

Guest Editors: Lukas Falcke
Abstract Deadline: June 30
Article Deadline: Full articles due September 15 (upon acceptance of abstract)

While the world is undergoing widespread digital and AI transformation, it is facing the urgent challenge of climate change, which threatens the very basic foundations of a functioning economy. Economic activities from industrial processes and increasingly energy-intensive data centers are producing greenhouse gases (GHG) that raise global temperatures. To avoid the worst consequences of climate change, the Paris Agreement lays out a commitment to limit the increase of global surface temperature to 1.5 or 2 degrees Celsius. While governments (e.g., the EU’s green deal) and companies (e.g., Microsoft’s net-zero ambitions) are increasingly setting targets to achieve net zero emissions by 2050, progress has been very limited.

With the exponential development of emerging digital innovations such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, or the metaverse, new opportunities arise to turn climate ambition into action. However, policymakers and managers alike seem to struggle with both their digital and their net-zero transition. Given digital innovation’s potential to significantly facilitate or hinder progress in the fight against climate change, it seems imperative to combine digital and climate efforts, focusing on a "twin transition." Yet, so far, both research and practice provide little guidance for managing the twin transition.

An upcoming issue of Amplify with Guest Editor Lukas Falcke will explore the interplay of digital innovation and climate change, focusing on understanding the challenges of a twin transition, providing guidance for effectively leveraging digital innovation in the fight against climate change, and influencing management practice. We invite researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to contribute articles that explore this topic. We are interested in applications across emission-intensive industries and novel digital approaches to climate change mitigation, adaptation, and regeneration.

Articles can address, but are not limited to, topics such as:

• How can emerging technologies like artificial intelligence, blockchain technology, and the metaverse facilitate climate change mitigation?
• How can managers and policymakers combine their climate strategies and digital transformation efforts?
• What role does data play in facilitating measuring and reducing emissions and climate impact?
• What role does digital innovation play in realizing firms’ ambitions of net-zero targets?
• How can digital platform models contribute to the fight against climate change?
• What is the role of digital innovation in building resilience to climate change and climate adaptation capabilities?
• What are new forms of organizing (communities, platforms, cooperatives, field labs) that can facilitate the integration of digital and sustainability strategies?
• What are the negative implications of leveraging computationally intensive digital technologies?
• How can digital technologies facilitate a collaborative approach to tackling climate change?
• What are examples of innovative digital approaches for climate change mitigation, adaptation, and regeneration? And what are the best practices that we can take from them?

FOR CONSIDERATION: Please send an abstract (~300 words or less of proposed article scope and author(s) bio) to Lukas Falcke and Christine Generali. Abstract submissions will be evaluated upon receipt, and authors will be notified soon after of acceptance status. Final article length is 2,000-3,500 words plus graphics. More editorial guidelines.

---

Scaffolding Purpose

Guest Editors: Oana Branzei and Dusya Vera
Abstract Deadline: June 15
Article Deadline: Full articles due July 25 (upon acceptance of abstract)

Purpose sounds beguilingly easy, but the journey to it is daunting, even for seasoned executives. Although many eventually claim to have reached it, purpose is not a “destination” leaders achieve. Rather, it is a tool that many master for the smaller as well as the greater good. On a personal level, purpose grounds and gives leaders an everyday stake in the greatest challenges, including crises, that their organizations face. Professionally, purpose is one of the few currencies and topics of discussion that transcends hierarchical levels and positionality. Individual purpose matters, but achieving organizational purpose relies on fostering sustained commitment from many individuals as they unite around common challenges.

Some might perceive purpose as a luxury reserved for exemplary leaders with compelling success stories to share.  Yet, purpose matters most when leaders collaboratively design and develop architectures of purpose that attract others who care about the same issues. Climate change. Injustice. Biodiversity. Inequality. The list is long, but the majority of new start-ups move our world forward by scaffolding purpose, one business model at a time. Such is the power of everyday purpose, to the extent that some business schools qualify profit as purposeful, while new leadership strategies underscore the importance of organizations serving multiple goals.

An upcoming issue of Amplify, with Guest Editors Oana Branzei and Dusya Vera, will curate timely and relevant insights on “how to purpose”. The focus will be on initially identifying the differences between every day and extreme purpose, followed by illustrating the transformative potential of scaffolding purpose through storytelling. We invite both real-life experiences and academic deep dives that demystify “how to purpose” by identifying strategies for scaffolding purpose in today’s organizations. Our goal is to elevate the discussion by providing guidance to leaders who are ready to engage in purpose-driven leadership.

We welcome global researchers, practitioners, policymakers, and stakeholders to contribute their insights and expertise to this critical discourse. We're particularly interested in the application of purpose to pressing issues like climate change (COP-28), biodiversity (COP-15), regeneration (Davos 2024), decarbonization, and Agenda 2030. Authors are invited to make explicit links to the Sustainable Development Goals, the Inner Development Goals, as well as ESG priorities, when applicable.

Articles can address, but are not limited to, topics such as:

• What is purpose good for; who should invest in it; when and how? What returns can be expected when leaders invest in purpose?
• What are the distinctions and connections among every day and extreme purpose? Can we have one without the other?
• Purpose washing: when do declarations of purpose become performative rather than transformative? Can a rush towards purpose lead executives into virtue signaling or grandstanding? Can purpose washing be off-putting and what are the short and long term-costs of lacking an implementation plan?
• Why is purpose better understood as a verb (purposing), or a series of actions (scaffolding) rather than a noun?
• How do leaders connect purpose and profit? Purpose and grand challenges? How can elevating purpose inform and even transform business models, ecosystems, and economies?
• What are the connections between purpose at different levels (individual, team, organization, industry, sector, partnership etc.) and ESG priorities?
• What are the benefits and the costs of purpose-first language? Can purpose-first leadership, strategies or economies lure us into a false sense of security where we believe we truly understand and support each other's purpose?
• What analogies are used in different echelons to reveal, evolve, and uphold purpose?
• What role does communicating purpose play within and between individuals and organizations? What trade-offs exist in communicating purpose too soon versus too late?
• Does purpose make a difference on the continuum between surviving and thriving in a world riddled with inequities?
• Can purpose change? Should it? When and where does purpose shift, and most importantly why and how?
• How can purpose-driven frameworks help us find opportunities in crises? Paths out of misery and suffering? Paths towards solidarity and flourishing?
• How does purpose shape our view of future challenges and guide our choices and actions?

FOR CONSIDERATION: Please send an abstract (~300 words or less of proposed article scope and author(s) bio) to Oana Branzei, Dusya Vera and Christine Generali. Abstract submissions will be evaluated upon receipt, and authors will be notified soon after of acceptance status. Final article length is 2,000-3,500 words plus graphics. More editorial guidelines.

---

Cultivating Resilience: Climate Change & Sustainable Agriculture

Guest Editor: Athula Ginige
Abstract Deadline: Closed
Article Deadline: June 24 (upon acceptance of abstract)

Climate change presents one of the most significant challenges of our time, impacting various sectors of human activity worldwide. Agriculture is a pivotal domain deeply affected by shifting climate patterns. FAO estimates that climate change could push 122 million more people, mainly farmers, into extreme poverty by 2030 and increase cereal prices by 29% by 2050, among other adverse effects.¹ Rising temperatures, changing precipitation patterns, extreme weather events, and alterations in pest and disease dynamics pose formidable challenges to global agricultural systems.

While agricultural activities significantly contribute to the emission of GHGs, agriculture also holds immense potential for mitigating climate change and adapting to its effects. According to the FAO report, a third of global soils are degraded, releasing 78 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and costing over 10% of GDP through lost biodiversity and ecosystem services. Around 14% of food, worth USD 400 billion, is lost post-harvest before it reaches retailers. According to FAO estimates, total food losses and waste cause 8% of greenhouse gas emissions.² Thus, climate-smart agricultural practices and better-coordinated agriculture value chain activities aimed at minimizing losses can contribute to mitigating climate change. Developing new crop varieties and cultivation methods that could adapt to climate change is also essential.

An upcoming issue of Amplify, with Guest Editor Athula Ginige, will explore the multifaceted relationship between climate change and agriculture, with a focus on understanding the challenges, identifying innovative solutions, and fostering sustainable practices. We welcome researchers, practitioners, policymakers, and stakeholders worldwide to contribute their insights and expertise to this critical discourse. Of particular interest is the application of digital technologies in agriculture that can contribute to mitigation or adaptation to the challenges posed by climate change.

Articles can address, but are not limited to, topics such as:

• What is the impact of climate change on crop yields and production systems, and what strategies can be implemented to address these impacts?
• What adaptation strategies can help achieve climate-resilient agriculture?
• What is the mitigation potential of agricultural practices, such as carbon sequestration and emissions reduction?
• What innovative technologies are available for climate-smart agriculture?
• What are the socioeconomic implications of climate change on agricultural communities, and what measures can be taken to address them?
• What policy frameworks and governance mechanisms are necessary to support climate-smart agriculture?
• How can traditional knowledge be effectively integrated with modern agricultural practices to enhance climate resilience?
• What water management strategies are most effective in response to changing precipitation patterns?
• How can food security challenges be effectively addressed in the midst of climate variability?
• What role does agricultural biodiversity play in both climate adaptation and mitigation efforts?
• How can we use carbon markets to foster climate-friendly agriculture practices?

FOR CONSIDERATION: Please send an abstract (~300 words or less of proposed article scope and author(s) bio) to Athula Ginige and Christine Generali. Abstract submissions will be evaluated upon receipt, and authors will be notified soon after of acceptance status. Final article length is typically 2,000-3,500 words plus graphics. More editorial guidelines.

^{1, 2} FAOs Work on Climate Change.pdf

---

Maximizing Business Value with Analytics

Guest Editor: Denis Dennehy
Abstract Deadline: closed
Article Deadline: closed

The global business analytics market size reached over US $89 billion in 2023. Looking ahead, The International Market Analysis Research and Consulting Group (IMARC Group) forecasts that the market will exceed US $180 Billion by 2032.¹

Business analytics is the systematic process of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting critical business data using a range of advanced statistical techniques, technologies such as artificial intelligence and big data analytics, and industry-specific software applications.

In the digital business era, decision-makers, innovators, strategists, and C-level management, are increasingly seeking innovative strategies to enhance their organizational capacity for extracting business value from large, complex data sets to augment decision-making, optimize processes, elevate business performance, and facilitate digital strategizing and implementation (see Figure 1).

Figure 1. Business value of data innovation, (Dennehy, 2020²)

 

In an upcoming issue of Amplify, Guest Editor Dr. Denis Dennehy will explore how organizations use business analytics (including AI and big data) to generate actionable insights and create business value.

As this issue seeks to foster knowledge exchange between academia and industry, we welcome submissions that go beyond mere descriptions of analytics applications and instead delve into discussions that explore the tangible business value derived from business analytics, as well as analytics as a whole.

Articles can address, but are not limited to, topics such as:

• How does business analytics (e.g., marketing, HR, banking, cybercrime) impact digital strategy, implementation, and organizational performance?
• How does leveraging business analytics drive digital transformation, boost organizational resilience (including supply chain), and contribute to sustainability (e.g., circular economy)?
• How does the use of business analytics inform innovation management, project management, and operational excellence?
• What best practices and lessons learned have emerged from the successful use of business analytics that can be applied to the adoption of emerging technologies?
• What new digital competencies and organizational changes (e.g., culture, processes, practices) have leadership teams introduced to maximize the value of business analytics and future proof their organization?
• What critical gaps exist in our understanding and use of analytics and how can industry/academic research collaborations address these knowledge gaps?

FOR CONSIDERATION: Please send an abstract (~300 words or less of proposed article scope and author(s) bio) to Denis Dennehy and Christine Generali. Articles should be accessible to non-specialized readers from various industries and sectors (e.g. financial services, healthcare). Technical discussions should explain the value proposition and the broader implications of analytics within the ecosystem. Abstract submissions will be evaluated upon receipt, and authors will be notified soon after of acceptance status. Final article length is typically 2,000-3,500 words plus graphics. More editorial guidelines.

¹ Business Analytics Market Report, IMARC Group

² Dennehy, D. (2020). Ireland After the Pandemic: Utilising AI to Kick-Start a Sustainable Economic Recovery. Cutter Business Technology Journal. 33(11), 22-27.

---

Editorial Guidelines

These notes are intended to give authors some guidance and direction for articles submitted to Amplify for publication. Additional Amplify editorial guidelines can be found here.

Editorial: Amplify is professionally edited by our team who evaluates articles for content, substance, grammar, and style and provides valuable feedback so that authors can revise and improve their papers before publication. Publishing turnaround times are short. Articles are also peer-reviewed by the Guest Editor who is an expert in the field.

Audience: Publishing with Cutter affords the opportunity to present your insights and research to a global audience of corporate executives, top academics, and leaders in the public and NGO/IGO sectors that is highly interested in emerging developments across the spectrum of business and technology. Typical readers of Amplify range from CxOs and other business leaders to technology executives, program leaders, product managers, engineering managers and development executives, along with professors from universities worldwide. Most work in fairly large organizations: Fortune 500 organizations, universities, NGOs/IGOs, and government agencies. Industries span: finance and banking, education, energy, entertainment, food, healthcare, insurance, travel/transportation and manufacturing.

Length: The recommended article length is 2,000-3,500 words, not including graphics. Please do your best to keep your article to this recommended length.

Article Format: Please send your article in word document format for editing purposes. Please do not send it as a PDF.

Editorial advice: Introductory-level, tutorial coverage of a topic is not very popular with our readership as they are senior-level people. Delete the introductory "fluff" and get to the meat of the topic. Assume you're writing for someone who has been in the industry for 10 to 20 years, is very busy, and very impatient. Assume he or she is mentally asking, while reading your article, "What's the point? What do I do with this information?" Apply the "so what?" test to everything you write.

General comments: We enjoy controversy and strong opinion; we like the fact that we can provide an alternative to standard "refereed" journals that sanitize articles. Because we don't carry any advertising, we can publish critical or negative comments about specific vendors or products. However, we obviously don't want to publish anything libelous or slanderous. Conversely, we don't publish self-serving commercial messages praising one's own product or service.

Style, grammar, and mechanics: For advice on good writing style, we recommend Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, The Chicago Manual of Style, and The Elements of Style (Strunk and White). We are fanatics about the editorial quality of Amplify; anything you can do to help us in this regard will be greatly appreciated.

Graphics: Please keep your use of graphics to a maximum of 4 and submit original, editable files (not static images). Preferably, create your graphics in MS Office (Word, PowerPoint, Excel) and submit them as a separate editable Office file. If this is not possible, send files as high-res PNG, JPEG, PDF, or Adobe Illustrator CC/EPS. All images owned by another party may only be used with owner's permission. It is the author's responsibility to obtain permission. Copying images off the Internet without permission infringes on copyright and is unacceptable for publication.

All graphics (figures and tables) must include captions and a reference within the text; for example: “(see Figure 1)” or “Figure 1 illustrates….” Please note that we may remove graphics deemed unnecessary. Please be minimalistic in your design: limit colors, shadings, and typefaces. For additional questions, please contact Linda Dias (dias.linda@adlittle.com).

Deadlines: Timely submission is crucial to meet our publishing deadline. If you anticipate delays, please inform us promptly so we can make necessary adjustments. Late submissions may not be included in the issue.

Editorial process: Once we get your article, we commence two parallel editorial passes: one for content (by the guest editor) and one for substance, grammar, and style (by a Cutter editor). Either or both of these initial editorial reviews may result in some questions or feedback from us. Most likely, we will send you a first draft "page proof" of your article for your review and approval.

Articles published in the journal must meet certain criteria relating to audience, technical content, and presentation. In the unlikely occurrence that, upon editorial review, your completed article does not meet with these requirements, Cutter Consortium reserves the right to decline the publishing of your article in the journal. Upon final acceptance, the article moves to additional copyediting and proofing stages, including layout. You will receive a PDF in layout form for final approval. We ask that this review take no more than 2-3 days.

Biographical sketch: At the end of each Amplify article, we like to include a brief (200 words or less) biographical sketch of each author along with email address of author(s). Click here for a sample. We also like to provide a color headshot. Please include a high-res color headshot (at least 300x300 pixels) of each author. We accept formal or casual photos that present authors in a professional manner. For samples, see our "Meet the Cutter Experts" section.

Copyrights: When you submit an article to us, you transfer copyright to Arthur D. Little and you warrant that you (or your employer) are the sole owner of the article, that it has not been previously published elsewhere, and that you have full power and authority to grant copyright to Arthur D. Little. You also warrant that it does not infringe on any copyright, violate any property rights, or contain scandalous, libelous, or unlawful matter.

Sourcing Content: Please limit to 20 if possible, prioritizing original thought. When you do draw on the work of other authors and researchers, cite your sources accordingly in the relevant part of the text (using endnote numbers or hyperlinks). Given that Cutter Consortium has no relationships with vendors, we cannot permit the use of references, quotes, statistics, and figures from analyst/research firms with vendor ties (Gartner, MetaGroup, Yankee Group, Forrester, IDC, McKinsey, among others), as the data may be biased. If you feel information from one of these sources is critical to your article, please bring it to our attention early in the editorial process and we will be happy to discuss the issue. Note that Cutter Consortium conducts studies and surveys occasionally in its various practice areas. This data is available for use in your articles or reports. If there is specific data you are looking for to support an argument, please contact us for more information. We will be happy to send you any relevant data. Keep in mind that if your article uses too many sources, it is often an indicator that your piece summarizes research too heavily and lacks original thought. Remember our readers are interested in your insights; above all, speak in an expert voice.

Promotion: Once the issue is published, we will provide you with a PDF of your individual article to share with your colleagues or to post on your website, social networks, academic research bases, etc. We will also provide you with a link to the entire issue to share with your contacts, post on your website, blog, social networks, etc. We ask that once the issue is published, that you do not post the entire issue PDF on any websites or social media sites unless given express permission.

Author Compensation: We are pleased to offer Amplify authors a complimentary online subscription to Amplify upon signing Cutter's license agreement. In addition, we occasionally pull excerpts, along with the author's bio, to include in weekly email Advisors to clients and in our bi-monthly Amplify Spotlight email newsletter, which reaches another 8,000 readers, and we publish excerpts on the Cutter LinkedIn and X feeds. If you plan to be speaking at industry conferences, we can arrange to make electronic copies of the issue in which you're published available for attendees of those speaking engagements — furthering your own promotional efforts.

Endnotes/References: When you draw on the work of other authors and researchers, please cite your sources. All sources/side commentary must be noted in relevant part of text (using endnote numbers) and listed in sequential order (i.e., order of appearance, not alphabetical order) at end of article in "References." All sources should include basic publishing information (i.e., author(s) name(s), complete title, publisher, date, and hyperlink and/or URL). Sources can be repeated but must be listed as a new endnote. The following are examples of various types of endnotes:

¹DeMarco, Tom, and Timothy Lister. Waltzing with Bears: Managing Risk on Software Projects. Dorset House, 2003.

²In this survey, “innovation” refers to any new initiatives to introduce innovative, leading-edge, or unconventional software project development methods, processes, tools, or techniques.

³Hall, Curt. “AI & Machine Learning in the Enterprise, Part XI: Success of AI Application Development Efforts.” Cutter Consortium Data Analytics & Digital Technologies, Executive Update, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2019.

⁴DeMarco and Lister (see 1).

⁵"About the Sustainability Practice." Cutter Consortium, accessed January 2021 .

 

Editorial Calendar 2024

Publishing Month	Topic	Guest Editor
January	Embedding Character Leadership Into Organizational DNA	Dusya Vera and Ana Ruiz Pardo
February	Beyond Orbiting: Toward a Sustainable Space Economy	Matteo Ainardi and Guillaume Storck
March	Sustainable Urban Mobility	Ani Melkonyan-Gottschalk
April	The Future of Corporate Responsibility	Cynthia Clark
May	Maximizing Business Value with Analytics	Denis Dennehy
June	Analytics: The Catalyst for Economic Value & Innovation	Denis Dennehy
July	Cultivating Resilience: Climate Change and Sustainable Agriculture	Athula Ginige
August	Scaffolding Purpose Part I	Oana Branzei and Dusya Vera
September	Scaffolding Purpose Part II	Oana Branzei and Dusya Vera
October	Innovation for Clinical Trial Success	Ulrica Sehlstedt, Ben Enejo, Franziska Thomas
November	Digital Innovation and Climate Change	Lukas Falcke
December	Sustainability	Margaret O'Gorman and Frank Werner

Editorial Calendar 2023

Publishing Month	Topic	Guest Editor
January	Disruption in Banking & Financial Services	Philippe De Backer
February	Advancing Workplace Equity	Viola Maxwell-Thompson
March	Connecting Business Strategy to Biodiversity Conservation	Judith Walls, Kerrigan Unter, and Leo Vogel
April	Digital Twins in Practice	Ron Zahavi
May	Ensuring Resilience in the Airline Industry	Sabine Reim & Jim Miller
June	Navigating Geopolitical Risks	David S. Lee
July	ESG Reporting Trends	Ethan Rouen
August	Generative AI: A Conversation with the Future	Michael Eiden
September	Blockchain Technologies and Environmental Sustainability	Horst Treiblmaier
October	Financing Sustainable Circular Investments	Joe Sarkis and Paul DeWick
November	The Journey to Decarbonization	Michael Kruse, Oliver Golly, Luis del Barrio, Florence Carlot
December	Character Leadership as a Competitive Advantage	Duysa Vera and Ana Ruiz Pardo

Editorial Calendar 2022

Publishing Month	Topic	Guest Editor
January 2022	Cyber Resilience & Countermeasures	Dr. Anjali Kaushik
February 2022	Reimagining Leadership & Teams	Tim Lister
March 2022	Data's Critical Role in Healthcare & Life Sciences	Ben van der Schaaf
April/May 2022	Defining Systems Change in Sustainable Business Parts I and II	Dr. Andrew Hoffman and Dr. Nicholas Poggioli
June 2022	Leadership Skills for the Post-Pandemic Era	Jon Ward
July 2022	Connecting the Dots with Knowledge Graphs	Michael Eiden
August 2022	Trends in the Automotive & Mobility Industries	Klaus Schmitz
September 2022	High Risk, High Stakes Decision Making in Turbulent Times	Michael Roberto
October 2022	DAOs and Token-Driven Organizations: Promises vs. Reality	Michel Avital and Nina-Birte Schirrmacher
November 2022	The Role of the Enterprise in a Nature Positive World, Part I	Margaret O'Gorman
December 2022	The Role of the Enterprise in a Nature Positive World, Part II	Margaret O'Gorman